The HTRC

The Homeowners & Trades Resource Center

You are here: Home / Building Codes / FAQ: Who reigns supreme? Codes Vs. Manufacturers Vs….

FAQ: Who reigns supreme? Codes Vs. Manufacturers Vs….

duct-cover-hatch-finish-viewIf you have been in the building industry any length of time, you know how confusing things can get with manufacturers stating you need to do X, which might be opposite of what the codes state, or figuring out which code applies. Recently, I got the following note regarding our article on attic hatches:

Corning states per UBC the 2″ foam board requires a 15-min fire barrier rating (e.g., 1/2″ drywall) be applied to exposed foam board surfaces; does this code not apply to foam board exposed in attic?

In this case the manufacturer is actually calling out a code section. While it is nice that they did this, the issue is that the UBC has been replaced in many area’s by the “I Codes” & does not really apply to homes. Granted many of the codes out there do require “exposed” foam to be protected (unless it meets certain tests) the questionnaire above has hit on an item I like to call a gray area.

I share the following in almost every presentation I do:

Just like life – Building Codes are Black and White…
With a whole lot of Gray in-between

I will give you my thoughts,
You might have your own thoughts,
But in the end…
The Building Inspector (or AHJ) Has the Final Say

The Gray Area’s:

In this case one has to wonder – what does exposed mean. For most it simply means being exposed to the living space, which in this case the attic door cover handles just fine. Ahh but what about in the attic – well I have known a few inspectors that will claim that needs to be covered also as that is how they read the code book. Many others will look at the space & say that as long as it isn’t used as livable space, for storage, &/or no mechanical equipment is located there, it isn’t required. The moral of this, always check with the AHJ if there is any doubt.

Tips, tricks, and things to rememberI know I mentioned above that the AHJ has the final say, but what happens when you know they are just flat out wrong, or there is a better way? The first thing to ask is does it really matter? As the saying goes, in many cases it is better to pick your battles wisely. The second is to remember that it is hardly personal & if you turn it that way, you might not like the current or long lasting results. Some quick tips or ways to approach an item:

  • Can you please show me where that is in the code book? (This generally works great for when they say something doesn’t meet codes but it is allowed per codes – generally I have found this is an issue when they change to a newer version & may not be as well versed in it as they may like – yes they are probably as busy or busier than us)
  • Try to schedule a meeting in their office with data showing your way is approved &/or works. Make sure if you do this you try to schedule a time that they will get back to you with their answer – hey it took you time to compile it, they are going to need some time to process it. (One of the best methods is to consult with the manufacturer & get a copy of their directions, ICCES results, etc… Next you may also wish to check out our 2 resource lists – with that I would recommend sticking to sites with actual test data, results & best practices)
  • Go up the chain – (be careful on this as many may take this personal) Granted in some cases it maybe an elected city or county official, but everyone answers to someone.

Which Code Applies:

2012-ieccOne of the best things to happen in many peoples eyes is with the required adoption of the energy codes, many states are adopting a statewide building code. Part of this means that many builders & remodelers don’t have to try to remember 3 or 4 different versions. With that said, in many locales there are “regional” issues that can occasionally pop up – for instance high fire areas, wind conditions & the local AHJ has the right & ability to interrupt, change, or adopt new provisions. This has led me on a few times to answer a question with, you need to contact your local building inspector as they may have a different code than what is actually printed.

Tips, tricks, and things to rememberOne trick I used to use was I essentially stayed up & only built to (ok better) than the recent code. With that there have been & probably always will be parts of the code that are debatable – for example the lateral hold down connectors. If I knew a city was on an older code I didn’t worry about having to deal with them or addressing this issue with an inspector.

Installation / Manufacturer Instructions:

One of the biggest issues with the older codes is that they were written before we had all these nice new specialty connectors, new methods & materials to use, and our knowledge of Building Science was a little more limited (can anyone say plastic in the walls). This has led to a dramatic shift over the last few code cycles to have either or statements written into the codes (either install per codes or per manufacturers directions) or just a straight – “install per manufacturers guidelines.”

Ahh but why the big shift – well there are actually two big reasons for the shift & the first one has to do with the issue above and not holding back a new technology because it wasn’t allowed per codes or even envisioned. The second has to do with trying to write a code that could cover all the bases – it simply can’t happen. To add to that, as many of these “manufacturer callouts” have to undergo testing (UL, ICC, etc…) to be approved for use it only makes sense to install them per the way they were tested & approved.

legalDo Not forget to save the manufacturers directions as you are required by code to be able to provide them to the inspector on request. Along those lines by saving the directions, you can provide them to the homeowner as part of a homeowners guide book which is not only required by many programs, but just a good idea in general.

Related posts:

Monday Musings: "We need more Ventilation?"

FAQ: Bifold door knob location

2018 IECC - Illinois Board Approved Version

Moving Forward: IRC 2009 Changes Chapter 1 - 4

Energy Code Basics: 3 Key Terms & Compliance Paths

2021 IECC & Illinois - Timeline

Guest Post: How The 2015 Energy Code Affects Historic & Existing Buildings

Monday Musings: ASHRAE part 2

Tweet

Filed Under: Building Codes, FAQ's, Acronym’s, & Terminology April 3, 2014 By SLS

Popular Categories

  • Common Sense Building
  • Tips & Tricks
  • FAQ’s, Acronym’s, & Terminology
  • Off-Grid Living
  • Spring Maintenance Checklist
  • Air Sealing & Insulation
  • Building Codes
  • Disaster Preparation
  • Deck & Outdoor Living
  • Holiday & Vacations
  • How-To’s & Planners
  • Myth or Misconception
  • Tool & Shop Safety
  • Universal Design

The HTRC - Copyright © 2006–2025 by TheHTRC.com & SLS Construction & Building Solutions LLC http://SLS-Construction.com